Category: Teaching

  • Policing in Schools- A Mandated Professional Activity?

    Close-up of the sirens on a cop car.
    Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

    On August 13, 2025, Kristin Rushowy wrote in the Toronto Star:

    The controversial police-in-schools initiative is not offered at every board — Toronto’s police chief has said there are no plans to reinstate it in the city — but the memo, sent out Tuesday by Education Minister Paul Calandra and Deputy Minister Denise Cole, says in those that do, a “summary of the program’s structure and objectives” should be included. School resource officers must be covered in all boards, even if they don’t run the program.


    Activities, they wrote, should contain “information about the role of police in providing high-quality, age-appropriate educational public safety presentations to students on subjects such as cyber-crime, human trafficking, road safety and other areas of local importance. Information should also be provided about the role of police in the school community, to support trust building between educators, policing services, students and parents/guardians.”

    […]

    It also says schools need to work “co-operatively with police partners” on the two yearly lockdown drills, keeping staff up to date on procedures — and “consider adding a bomb threat drill as part of their emergency evacuation drills and that school personnel should work co-operatively with police partners on these drills.”

    It isn’t surprising that such news would “break” a few weeks out from the new school year. I have become accustomed to changes in policy being revealed at less than opportune times by this Ontario government.

    The public English school board in Ottawa (the OCDSB)had SROs in schools when I first started teaching here but within a few years they were taken out after exhaustive consulting. Ottawa’s police force (the OPS) has had a storied past of negative interactions and incidents while the SRO programme was in place. The Asilu Collective did a lot of work compiling a report on this matter (which can be helpfully read here).

    If teachers are going to be mandated to learn about the roles of police in our communities I believe it’s important we understand the scope of what that means. To that end I’m writing this post to educate the average educator on why this is a bad idea.

    I will throw in a caveat: if you bring this up in staff meetings or during the PA day itself you will probably receive push back one way or another. Teaching in Ontario is an overwhelmingly white profession. Despite lip service teachers pay to equity and progressive politics very few are willing to upset the status quo, rock the boat, or hold disruptive conversations. A majority-white staff will often have no problems with bringing police into a school serving a racialized community, no matter what books they say they’ve read. The intention of this paragraph isn’t to scare you into silence but to hopefully make you more aware of the potential dynamics should you broach this topic.

    Furthermore, this post will be written from an Ottawa-heavy lens as that is where I currently teach. I am confident you will find similar articles and arguments in local news sources. I encourage you to find these stories in the communities you’re employed in.

    History

    My background, such as it is, is in history and I like to tackle problems in the present with a historical understanding. If you were to examine the history of policing in Canada what would be the broad strokes?

    • In the early 19th century, the eastern colonies followed policing examples in England. Confederation in 1867 helped nudge the creation of provincial police forces.
    • What people now call the RCMP got its start in the 1870s as the North West Mounted Police. The organization got its genesis from Macdonald’s desire to crush Indigenous resistance (and his ongoing genocide) in the west. It was a heavily militarized police force, straying away from England’s Metropolitan Police Act, designed to enforce Canada’s “sovereignty” on its western “frontier”.
    • The NWMP (and later the RCMP) contributed to the ongoing genocide of Indigenous Peoples from the 1870s onward. They were often tasked with capturing First Nations children and placing them within the Indian Residential School System, a role ghoulishly immortalized on paraphernalia at the time. If you think the RCMP has seriously strayed from its militarized approach to Indigenous resistance in the 2020s, the documentary ‘Yintah’ is mandatory viewing (you can watch it for free, in Canada, on CBC Gem; Netflix also carries it).
    • National and provincial police forces are not the only examples of extreme police behaviours towards Indigenous Peoples. Municipal police forces are just as culpable. One notable example are the so-called “Starlight Tours”. The Saskatoon Police Service apprehended First Nations men on winter nights, drove outside the city limits and then left them to freeze to death. These murders were happening throughout the 90s and 00s.
    • Birth Alerts continue to cause trauma in many First Nations communities. Essentially, police and/or social workers are called when someone is deemed “at-risk” and their baby is taken soon after birth. First Nations women are disproportionately targeted by these actions.

    I’m of the belief that policing in Canada hasn’t strayed too far from its roots just after Confederation. There is ample evidence of the harm these forces have caused for generations. Bringing US-style tactics and training has only led to further targeting of BIPOC communities. Canada’s police forces have repeatedly trained with, and have been trained by, Israel’s security forces (a country with a similar history of subjugation, oppression, and genocide). The end result is an increasingly militant force capable of more disproportionate responses when confronted with resistance.

    Painting police forces as some kind of benevolent actor in Canadian history does a disservice. There is definitely a lot of baggage to unpack when you think of the inter-generational trauma from police actions when you consider putting them into schools.

    Role of the Police in the Local Community

    It will be difficult to be concise and focused in this section. When I moved to Ottawa from Gangeung, South Korea, I was aghast at the frequent stories of police abuse in the news. If the Ministry of Education wishes for teachers to learn about the police’s role in our schools’ communities then it’s hard to avoid the negative press.

    It can be overwhelming going through this list of incidents. It should be remembered that this list is curated; there is a multitude of news stories I could link to make my point clear. The fact the force continues to employ many of the above individuals while the province is trying to get police back into schools should be clearly problematic. This cannot be dismissed as a few bad apples when the misconduct is provided cover by continued employment and six-figure paycheques.

    Montsion easily making more than 3x the amount of the highest paid teacher after beating a Black man senseless leading to his death should make people uncomfortable. If the purpose of a system is what it does then what does this say about our police force? Elevating these individuals after such misconduct is nearly impossible to justify (although I am sure some will try).

    What About the Past Role of SROs & Police in Schools?

    As I wrote above, the OCDSB had SROs actively in schools when I first started working in Ottawa. I never got to know any personally but I would sometimes see them here and there at different sites. They would often be on school grounds with a firearm on their hip.

    The incident in Peel where a six year old Black girl was handcuffed at school was often on my mind when I heard of students interacting with police when I was a student teacher. I was waiting for city transit to take me to a school to work when Ottawa police tased and shot Greg Ritchie to death a few metres away(one of the officers involved was involved in a separate incident but was acquitted as well), so I have a particularly dim view of their role to make others safe.

    The OCDSB voted to end its relationship with the SRO programme in 2021. The trustees motioned that the Board issue a public apology for the harm done by the SRO programme. However, I can’t remember if the apology was ever produced. References are no longer easily accessible on the OCDSB’s website and only the intention of an apology can be found in archived versions of a page on the Board’s website.

    This motion came out of consultations within the OCDSB’s community. Students, parents and staff members came forward as part of the process. The firsthand accounts collected by the Asilu Collective go into detail how students felt interacting with SROs in their schools. You owe it to yourself to read it.

    The argument that assigning SROs to schools allows officers to better know the school community doesn’t hold much water when we see the evidence of their actions. Students feeling profiled by police is not how you build a caring and inclusive environment for a healthy school. Why should students be taught to feel safe around police when the police’s actions indicate otherwise?

    Saying police play a role in preventing crime doesn’t seem to hold much water in numerous studies from the USA or Canada. Arguing the presence of the police in schools will keep crime down is dubious at best as police most often react to crime after the fact (and as the linked studies suggest, they don’t exactly solve it after the fact either).

    In Conclusion

    The question we need to be asking as this PA rolls out is: who benefits from this? We are seeing the intentional underfunding of the education system in Ontario while police budgets continue to grow. You can see how stagnant the OCDSB’s budget is between the 2024-2025 school year and the 2025-2026 school year. You can then judge how the OPS’s budgets stack up in comparison. The OPS has around 2400 employees. The OCDSB is projecting around 77,000 students and over 12,000 staff according to its 2025 budget.

    Of course, since the Ministry of Education has actively taken over boards across the province, including the OCDSB, many do not have trustees to vote on this issue. I am hoping that unions start providing their members with tips on how to effectively counter yet another infringement.

    In the meantime, you are fully capable of arming yourself with knowledge. If Ottawa isn’t your locale, then look for police misconduct reports in your area. Look for firsthand accounts from populations historically oppressed by the police in Canada. Examine which groups actively call for more policing and who benefits from that expansion. Check out ‘Policing Black Lives‘ by Robyn Maynard and ‘The Skin We’re In‘ by Desmond Cole. Don’t be afraid to give dissenting opinions at staff meetings or when contact with the police is suggested. Get involved with political groups within your union to find like-minded individuals. Demand your local representative justify why this Professional Activity is necessary (and let me know their response).

  • Discounts for Ontario Teachers

    Every once in a while, I will remind my friends when we are out and about that we have access to different discounts and rewards programs.

    What they have to offer changes frequently, so it’s worth checking out prior to any big purchases.

    Keep in mind that I am an OCT with ETFO, so if you belong to a different licensing body or union, then accessibility to the following rewards programs may be limited. I’m also based in Ottawa, so may be unaware of discounts offered in your region. I’ll update this post if I uncover more or if people send them my way.

    Through the OCT

    venngo Member Perks for Ontario Teachers

    chalkboardplus+ (Perkopolis)

    Through ETFO

    Edvantage

    In General

    Apple offers discounts with education pricing.

    Art Gallery of Ontario offers free admission and other perks.

    Canada Aviation and Space Museum offers free visits for teachers.

    Canadian Museum of History offers perks and free admission on certain days.

    Michaels has a discount programme for teachers.

    Microsoft offers discounts, including getting Office365 free.

    Royal Ontario Museum offers discounts year round and also free days in the summer.

    Science North and Dynamic Earth has free admission and resources.

    Staples offers a teachers membership program to save on classroom supplies.

  • Notwithstanding Clause

    Notwithstanding Clause

    The Ford PCs won their second mandate in Ontario in 2022. Did they get any better at governing since 2018 when they first came to power?

    *shakes magic 8 ball*

    Hmm, don’t count on it.

    The Ford PCs have long had a prickly relationship with educators and education workers. In the run-up to the 2018 provincial election, they promised to get rid of the updated Health and Physical Education curriculum document, because it dared to talk about gender identity and consent. If teachers chose to ignore this openly transphobic and queerphobic move, the PCs were ready with a teacher snitch line. When they won, they scrapped a TRC-mandated summer curriculum writing session that was to focus on Indigenous education.

    A pattern emerges.

    Cuts to education started in 2018 and haven’t abated in 2022.

    The author on the streets of Ottawa (February 2021). I drew a different sign for each day of picketing.

    Education unions went on strike with votes taking place in 2019 and picketing happening over much of the province in 2020, up until the COVID pandemic shuttered the province. Ford, and his education minister, Stephen Lecce, were in full combat mode. Cuts were felt across the entire education system, with the system straining to keep up with the needs of its students. The status quo was maintained when the strike was over.

    However, conservatives and Conservatives alike were not happy. They wanted to take away teachers’ right to strike, a right enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The result? Well, let’s fast forward to November 2022.

    CUPE’s education workers staged a protest on Friday, November 4. Stephen Lecce was more than slightly displeased by this turn of events. The PCs took the highly contentious decision of using the Notwithstanding Clause and legislate CUPE’s workers (Ford, however, was somewhere else for the vote).

    Section 33 was first invoked in the 1980s. Ontario, under Doug Ford, first flirted with using the Notwithstanding Clause in 2018 after it came into power. Ford wanted to settle some old scores and tamper with Toronto’s city council. Ultimately it wasn’t use. In 2019, Quebec used it (they were the first to invoke it in the 80s) to prevent religious symbols from being worn in public by public servants. This change in Quebec’s laws directly impacted hijabi teachers, and jobs were lost as a result. Boldened by Quebec’s success, the Ford government used it to increase individual political campaign donations in 2021.

    Coming off another majority, but failing to get most Ontarians to vote, Ford is once more facing the ire of education workers and educators. Inflation has caused housing, food, and everything else to skyrocket in price. Guess what didn’t move up with inflation? Salaries in education. Workers are facing less support in schools, thanks to endless austerity cuts, despite the province posting a surplus. They are increasingly expected to live in poverty and make use of foodbanks.

    Do all these links paint a vivid enough picture yet? They should and it is bleak.

    Ontario is dealing with an orchestrated campaign to destabilize social safety nets and public services while aiming for a transition to privatized options. It has started in earnest in healthcare. Journalists in relationships with Ford staffers are pushing the same for education.

    What can you do? Pressure your PC MPPs. Join a picketing location near you. Donate grocery gift cards to those protesting. Push your unions and non-PC MPPs to aim for a general strike. We can stop these attacks by working together.

    May the Force be with us all.

  • Creating a Press Corps

    Creating a Press Corps

    Korean middle school student holding an iPad prepares to film a news segment.
    Students in Gangneung prepare to shoot a news segment for their English camp.

    When I taught in Daegu and Gangneung, I would encourage the students to create multimedia content. It was a way for the students to use their language abilities in an unorthodox way and pick up a practical skill. More often than not, this looked like video creation. In Daegu, I was learning the ropes when it came to making videos. Video editing for the purposes of maintaining a YouTube channel was in its infancy back then (in fact, I started on the now defunct Google Video service). There was a lot of learning on the fly, but the students and I mostly filmed short comedic skits.

    By the time I moved to Gangneung in 2010, YouTube had picked up momentum. Vlogging had taken over blogging and creating your own YouTube channel was all the rage. My students (the Ontario equivalent of grades 7, 8, and 9) joined me in various initiatives. I ran after-school English clubs, as well as seasonal camps, which were free for the students to attend. As long as the students used English, I was completely free to determine the content of these extra curriculars. They soon became multimedia creation sessions with video shooting and editing being the primary focus.

    It was genuinely cool. The students were pumped to learn how to create videos, from the scripting process to basic direction and even postproduction. It became a big enough thing that the school eventually made me the videographer for important events. I’d film the festivals and host them on my YouTube channels so parents could watch. They had me go on different field trips so I could make a video of the excursion. They’d use the videos for committee meetings and meet-the-teachers nights at the start of the school year.

    When I returned to Canada, I wanted to create a similar project. I wanted to create a cadre of student reporters that would essentially be a self-contained news team. Unlike Korea, it can be very difficult starting off as a new teacher in Ontario. It takes forever to become permanent, which often means you are switching schools too frequently to start a project like this.

    Three years ago, I managed to get a video club off the ground at the elementary school I did most of my substitute teaching at (called supply teaching here). The students and I learned how to shoot short videos and edit them. We managed to create content for a school concert while the different acts got organized in the background. It proved successful but then the pandemic struck, and I switched schools the following September.

    The pandemic is still very much a reality; however, I am back at the same school. Once we were able to create clubs again, I wasted no time in setting up my latest project. The students who had joined my previous video editing club several years back wanted to know if I would be starting it up again. I would, but with an expanded focus.

    This time it would be a press corps. It’s currently open to grade 7 and 8 students and they’ve been busy. One of our tasks is to create content for the school’s website which hadn’t been updated in a very long time. Student reporters are now setting up interviews with staff and different classes. They are shooting and editing videos. They are drafting interview questions and learning how to direct a video shoot. They are observing events and writing articles. They are creating graphics to use as banners and inserts. It has been really cool!

    I was able to preload a lot of these skills with the students, because for many of them I’ve been teaching Drama using filmmaking as the hook. They’ve learned how to create scripts for short videos, how to shoot a video on a Chromebook using blocking strategies, and they gotten used to some basic editing. They’ve been able to bring those skills into staff interviews and it has paid off.

    It’s still in the early stages and we are learning as we go but here are some of the logistics:

    -We currently meet in person once a week. During this time, we pitch story ideas, go over any progress or updates, and collaborate to create the next pieces.

    -I have set up a Google Classroom to use as reservoir for updates for when we need to communicate something to each other. Each piece we are working on is an assignment that links to the shared drive.

    -I set up a shared Google Drive between all the students. That way they can dump all the files into the appropriate folders. They all have access through their school email addresses.

    -I created a YouTube channel for our video content. Originally, I was just going to keep the uploads to Google Drive and change the privacy settings, but playback was an issue. Nearly any device can access YouTube so that solved the issues I was having.

    -I created a Google Site that can serve as a public archive for our pieces. Eventually things will be bumped off the school’s website and I didn’t want the students to lose all their hard work. Anything we post to the website is mirrored on the Google Site. It’s also a good way to share pieces with those who need to vet stuff before it goes live on the school’s website.

    -The students have agreed to a code of ethics I drafted. This includes using technology appropriately.

    -The students are learning by making mistakes. I’m keeping a pretty tight grip on things but eventually the students will gradually take over most aspects of the press corps and assume responsibility. The grade 7 students from this year can then become the leaders for next year (hopefully I am at the same school).

    While the students are picking up all these new skills, my hope is that they find them useful going forward in their lives. Media literacy is a big stickler for me during this age of misinformation and disinformation. Getting students interested in journalism and reporting will hopefully set them up for success in decoding much of what is being consumed online. Getting a foot in the door when it comes to photography and videography before entering high school can also have its advantages. Having their writing published can also spark growth in different rewarding creative venues. Ultimately, though, it’s a way to rebuild connections between different parts of the school community that have been sequestered during the pandemic.